泥质砂岩在干燥与饱和流体状态下纵波速度之间的关系

doi:10.6038/pg20170422

地球物理学进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 1574-1583.doi: 10.6038/pg20170422

泥质砂岩在干燥与饱和流体状态下纵波速度之间的关系

李东庆^1,2,3, 魏建新^1,2,3, 狄帮让^1,2,3, 王贸^1,2,3, 张超⁴

1. 中国石油大学(北京)地球物理与信息工程学院, 北京 102249;
2. 中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室, 北京 102249;
3. 中国石油大学(北京)CNPC物探重点实验室, 北京 102249;
4. 大庆钻探工程公司地球物理勘探一公司, 大庆 163357

收稿日期:2016-12-13 修回日期:2017-05-28 出版日期:2017-08-20 发布日期:2017-08-20
通讯作者: 魏建新,男,1958年生,教授,博导,主要从事地震物理模型研究.(E-mail:weijx@cup.edu.cn) E-mail:weijx@cup.edu.cn
作者简介:李东庆,男,1988年生,博士研究生,从事岩石物理和地震物理模拟方面的研究.(E-mail:lidongqing555@126.com)
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05007-006）和国家自然科学基金（41474112）联合资助.

Corrections between the saturated and dry P-wave velocity of argillaceous sandstone

LI Dong-qing^1,2,3, WEI Jian-xin^1,2,3, DI Bang-rang^1,2,3, WANG Mao^1,2,3, ZHANG Chao⁴

1. College of Geophysics and Information Engineering, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
3. CNPC Key Laboratory of Geophysical Exploration, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
4. NO.1 Geophysical Exploration Company of Daqing Drilling & Exploration Engineering Company CNPC, Daqing 163357, China

Received:2016-12-13 Revised:2017-05-28 Online:2017-08-20 Published:2017-08-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

岩石从干燥状态下到饱和流体后纵波速度的变化情况对于地震速度预测、AVO分析以及流体识别具有重要意义，而有关泥质砂岩在干燥与饱和流体状态下纵波速度之间关系的研究甚少.因此本文利用三组实验数据研究了泥质砂岩在干燥与饱和流体状态下纵波速度之间关系的影响因素，并通过多元线性回归分析方法建立泥质砂岩饱和流体后的纵波速度与干燥状态下的纵波速度、孔隙度以及黏土含量之间的关系.研究表明：泥质砂岩在干燥与饱和流体状态下纵波速度之间的简单线性关系容易受到固结程度、孔隙流体性质以及围压的影响，而多元线性回归分析与简单线性分析相比，其拟合结果的判定系数明显提高，标准误差明显减小.此外，本文首次提出黏土含量与孔隙度比的概念（CPR），发现CPR与泥质砂岩饱和流体前后纵波速度差之间有很好的正相关性，随着CPR的增加，纵波速度差也表现出增大的趋势，CPR的提出为解释流体替换过程中岩石物理属性的变化情况提供了新的思路.

Abstract:

Rocks from the dry state to saturated fluid changes in P-wave velocity is important for seismic velocity prediction, AVO analysis and reservoir fluid identification. However, few studies have looked into the corrections between the saturated and dry P-wave velocity of argillaceous sandstone, to fill this gap, in this study three sets of data were studied by simple linear regression and multiple regression analysis. Studies have shown that the corrections between the saturated and dry P-wave velocity of argillaceous sandstone is easily affected by consolidation degree, pore fluid property and confining pressure, and the correlation coefficient obtained by multiple regression is higher than that of simple linear regression, the standard error is obviously reduced. In addition, there is a good correlation between the P-wave velocity difference of the argillaceous sandstone and the Clay Porosity Ratio (CPR). With the increase of CPR, the P-wave velocity difference also showed an increasing trend. Therefore, CPR provides a new way to explain the change of petrophysical properties of rock in the process of fluid substitution.

中图分类号:

P631

李东庆, 魏建新, 狄帮让, 王贸, 张超. 2017. 泥质砂岩在干燥与饱和流体状态下纵波速度之间的关系. 地球物理学进展, 32(4): 1574-1583. doi: 10.6038/pg20170422.

LI Dong-qing, WEI Jian-xin, DI Bang-rang, WANG Mao, ZHANG Chao. 2017. Corrections between the saturated and dry P-wave velocity of argillaceous sandstone. Progress in Geophysics. 32(4): 1574-1583. doi: 10.6038/pg20170422.

参考文献

Batzle M, Wang Z J. 1992. Seismic properties of pore fluids[J]. Geophysics, 57(11):1396-1408.
Christensen N I. 1974. Compressional wave velocities in possible mantle rocks to pressures of 30 kilobars[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 79(2):407-412.
Dou Y, Gui Z S, Gao G, et alDvorkin J, Moos D, Packwood J L, et al. 1999. Identifying patchy saturation from well logs[J]. Geophysics, 64(6):1756-1759.
Gassmann F. 1951. Elastic waves through a packing of spheres[J]. Geophysics, 16(4):673-685.
Gregory A R. 1976. Fluid saturation effects on dynamic elastic properties of sedimentary rocks[J]. Geophysics, 41(5):895-921.
Han D H. 1987. Effects of porosity and clay content on acoustic properties of sandstones and unconsolidated sediments[Ph. D. thesis]. Stanford, California:Stanford University.
Han D H, Nur A, Morgan D. 1986. Effects of porosity and clay content on wave velocities in sandstones[J]. Geophysics, 51(11):2093-2107.
Hornby B E. 1998. Experimental laboratory determination of the dynamic elastic properties of wet, drained shales[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(B12):29945-29964.
Ito K, Tatsumi Y. 1995. Measurement of elastic wave velocities in granulite and amphibolite having identical H₂O-free bulk compositions up to 850℃ at 1 GPa[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 133(3-4):255-264.
Kahraman S. 2007. The correlations between the saturated and dry P-wave velocity of rocks[J]. Ultrasonics, 46(4):341-348.
Karakul H, Ulusay R. 2013. Empirical correlations for predicting strength properties of rocks from P-wave velocity under different degrees of saturation[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 46(5):981-999.
King M S. 2009. Recent developments in seismic rock physics[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 46(8):1341-1348.
Kitamura K, Masuda K, Takahashi M, et al. 2006. The influence of pore fluids on seismic wave velocities under high temperature and high pressure conditions:Development of a new technique with gas apparatus at AIST, Japan[J]. Earth, Planets and Space, 58(11):1515-1518.
Klimentos T. 1991. The effects of porosity-permeability-clay content on the velocity of compressional waves[J]. Geophysics, 56(12):1930-1939.
Knight R, Dvorkin J, Nur A. 1998. Acoustic signatures of partial saturation[J]. Geophysics, 63(1):132-138.
Korneev V, Glubokovskikh S. 2013. Seismic velocity changes caused by an overburden stress[J]. Geophysics, 78(5):WC25-WC31.
Li D Q, Wei J X, Di B R. 2016. Comparison S-wave velocity estimated from soft-porosity and lee models[J]. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 21(13):4895-4906.
Mavko G, Mukerji T, Dvorkin J. 2009. The Rock Physics Handbook[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press, 143-150.
Nur A, Simmons G. 1969. The effect of saturation on velocity in low porosity rocks[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 7(2):183-193.
Qiao E W, Zhao W H, Long C X. 2012. A laboratory study of seismic wave velocity in sandstone bearing differential pore fluids at different pressures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 55(12):4257-4265,doi:10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.12.037.
Shi X J, Xia C J, Wu Y G. 1998. The laboratory study on wave velocity under reservoir condition and its affection factors[J]. Acta Geophysica Sinica (in Chinese), 41(2):234-241.
Thill R E, Bur T R. 1969. An automated ultrasonic pulse measurement system[J]. Geophysics, 34(1):101-105.
Wang D X, Xin K F, Li Y M, et al. 2006. An experimental study of influence of water saturation on velocity and attenuation in sandstone under stratum conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 49(3):908-914, doi:10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2006.03.037.
Wang P, Wu G C. 2015. The rock physics modeling for tight reservoir based on the self-consistent approximation[J]. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 30(5):2233-2238, doi:10.6038/pg20150533.
Wyllie M R J, Gregory A R, Gardner L W. 1956. Elastic wave velocities in heterogeneous and porous media[J].Geophysics,21(1):41-70.
Xiong X J, Lv W Z, Zhou D H, et al. 2015. The rock physical analysis to test the applicability of the analysis of Vp-Vs relationship[J]. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 30(4):1941-1945, doi:10.6038/pg20150456.
Yin S, Ding W L, Sun Y H, et al. 2016. Experimental study on pore/fissure morphology evolution of gas-bearing tight sandstone under different confining pressure conditions[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum (in Chinese), 55(3):326-332.
Zhang W L, Sun Z D, He X W, et al. 2015. Two key points of rock-physics template and its application[J]. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 30(5):2324-2329, doi:10.6038/pg20150545.
Zharikov A V, Lebedev E B, Dorfman A M, et al. 2000. Effect of saturating fluid composition on the rock microstructure, porosity, permeability and Vp under high pressure and temperature[J]. Phys. Chem. Earth A, 25(2):215-218.
Zhou C, Feng Y D, Xiao K X, et al. 2014. Research on water requirement in northeast area based on multiple linear regression model[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory (in Chinese), 44(1):118-123.
窦龑, 桂志先, 高刚,等. 2015. 基于Gassmann方程流体替换的影响因素分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 30(5):2150-2156, doi:10.6038/pg20150520.
乔二伟, 赵卫华, 龙长兴. 2012. 含不同孔隙流体的砂岩地震波速度随压力变化的实验研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 55(12):4257-4265, doi:10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.12.037.
施行觉, 夏从俊, 吴永钢. 1998. 储层条件下波速的变化规律及其影响因素的实验研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 41(2):234-241.
王大兴, 辛可锋, 李幼铭,等. 2006. 地层条件下砂岩含水饱和度对波速及衰减影响的实验研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 49(3):908-914, doi:10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2006.03.037.
王璞, 吴国忱. 2015. 基于自相容近似的致密储层岩石物理建模[J]. 地球物理学进展, 30(5):2233-2238, doi:10.6038/pg20150533.
熊晓军, 吕文正, 周东红,等. 2015. 岩石物理测试分析的Vp-Vs关系式的适用性分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 30(4):1941-1945, doi:10.6038/pg20150456.
尹帅, 丁文龙, 孙圆辉,等. 2016. 不同围压条件下含气致密砂岩孔裂隙形态演化试验研究[J]. 石油物探, 55(3):326-332.
张万龙, 孙赞东, 贺薪蔚,等. 2015. 地震岩石物理模板应用中的两个关键问题[J]. 地球物理学进展, 30(5):2324-2329, doi:10.6038/pg20150545.
周晨, 冯宇东, 肖匡心,等. 2014. 基于多元线性回归模型的东北地区需水量分析[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 44(1):118-123.

[1]	屈念念,李家斌,张西君,刘俊. 基于重磁资料研究贵州省深部构造特征[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1785-1793.
[2]	安鹏,曹丹平,赵宝银,杨晓利,张明. 基于LSTM循环神经网络的储层物性参数预测方法研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1849-1858.
[3]	陈稳,薛国强,陈卫营,周楠楠,卢云飞. SOTEM多分量激电响应特性分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1859-1865.
[4]	豆辉,徐逸鹤. 黏性逆时偏移成像研究进展[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1866-1877.
[5]	毛庆辉,王鹏,曾隽. 水力压裂微地震事件定位方法综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1878-1886.
[6]	尚新民,王延光,崔庆辉,金昌昆,赵翠霞,滕厚华,赵胜天. 准南缘山前带精细近地表建模技术研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1887-1892.
[7]	石战战,夏艳晴,王元君,周怀来,庞溯,池跃龙. 基于L₁-L₁范数稀疏表示的共偏移距道集地震数据重建方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1893-1899.
[8]	王迪,陈敏,王健伟,盛志超,严曙梅,马美媛,李东哲,郑欣. 基于T₂和毛管压力分类转换的渗透率计算新方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1900-1909.
[9]	王海波,张伟,张宏,肖虎,高云路,顾剑华,唐美斌,韩峰. 高精度可控震源在深反射地震采集中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1910-1916.
[10]	王静, 张军华, 王延光, 杨勇, 冯德永, 武刚, 黄德峰. 特征值相干理论诠释及效果比较[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1917-1923.
[11]	王维红,包培楠,陈国飞,林弘喆. 基于最小平方的横波速度拟合及应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1924-1929.
[12]	王亚,王孟华,田建章,王成泉,彭玲丽,冯小英,周兴海,张浩. 一种适用于深潜山及内幕的有效储层地震预测方法——以廊固凹陷杨税务潜山为例[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1930-1937.
[13]	吴曲波,潘自强,陈金勇,Mubarak,Hani. 利用瞬态瑞雷面波法探测浅层玄武岩三维分布——以沙特Sabkhah Ad Dumathah地区为例[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1938-1944.
[14]	严小丽,康慧敏,王光杰,何国丽,李红领. AMT方法在鳌山卫花岗岩地区深部地热构造勘探中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1945-1953.
[15]	尹奇峰,潘冬明,郭全仕,何情. 基于快速模拟退火算法的井中微地震事件定位反演[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1954-1961.

泥质砂岩在干燥与饱和流体状态下纵波速度之间的关系

Corrections between the saturated and dry P-wave velocity of argillaceous sandstone

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

多维度评价

本文评价