基于分组互相关成像条件的微震逆时成像定位方法

doi:10.6038/pg2019BB0420

地球物理学进展 ›› 2019, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 125-135.doi: 10.6038/pg2019BB0420

• 应用地球物理学Ⅰ（油气及金属矿产地球物理勘探） • 上一篇下一篇

基于分组互相关成像条件的微震逆时成像定位方法

李青峰¹,张建中^1,^2,^*()

^1. 中国海洋大学海洋地球科学学院,海底科学与探测技术教育部重点实验室,山东青岛 266100
^2. 青岛海洋科学与技术国家实验室,海洋矿产资源评价与探测技术功能实验室,山东青岛 266061

收稿日期:2018-05-13 修回日期:2018-11-20 出版日期:2019-02-20 发布日期:2019-04-15
通讯作者: 张建中 E-mail:zhangjz@ouc.edu.cn
作者简介:李青峰,男,1993年生,硕士研究生,主要从事微地震资料处理、定位和成像研究.(E-mail: ouc_lqf@126.com)
基金资助:
山东省重点研发计划项目(2017GSF16103);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助课题联合资助.(20130132110023)

Reverse-time image for microseismic localization using grouping crosscorrelation imaging condition

LI Qing-feng¹,ZHANG Jian-zhong^1,^2,^*()

^1. Key Lab of Submarine Geosciences and Prospecting Techniques, College of Marine Geosciences, Ocean University of China, Shandong Qingdao 266100, China
^2. Evaluation and Detection Technology Laboratory of Marine Mineral Resources, National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Shandong Qingdao 266061, China

Received:2018-05-13 Revised:2018-11-20 Online:2019-02-20 Published:2019-04-15
Contact: Jian-zhong ZHANG E-mail:zhangjz@ouc.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

地面微地震记录的信噪比常常很低,微地震走时拾取困难,难以利用基于微震走时的方法进行震源定位,微震逆时成像作为有潜力的地面微震定位方法而成为研究热点.微震逆时成像的效果和效率与所使用的成像条件密切相关.本文通过对不同信噪比微地震记录的逆时成像实验,在分析现有的自相关和互相关成像条件优缺点的基础上,提出分组互相关成像条件,讨论了分组方式对成像结果的影响.结果表明:分组互相关成像兼顾了自相关和互相关成像的优势,避免了它们的缺点.通过采用合适的分组方式,可以在满足计算效率要求的情况下,获得空间分辨率很高的震源成像结果.分组互相关成像对低信噪比资料具有很强的适应性,是一种很有前景的地面微震定位方法.

关键词: 微地震定位, 低信噪比资料, 逆时成像, 成像条件, 分组互相关

Abstract:

Surface microseismic data often has a very low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). It is difficult to pick up the traveltime of microseismic events from the surface microseismic data. Then the traveltime-based methods cannot be used to locate the source at this situation. So the microseismic reverse-time image as a potential method for surface microseismic location has been paid attention to. The accuracy and efficiency of microseismic reserve-time imaging are closely related to the imaging conditions. In this paper, we analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the existing autocorrelation and crosscorrelation imaging conditions through the numerical experiments on microseismic reverse-time imaging from data with different SNR, and then propose the grouping crosscorrelation imaging condition. We also discuss the influence of the grouping on the imaging. The results show that the grouping crosscorrelation imaging has the advantages of both autocorrelation and crosscorrelation imagings, and avoids their shortcomings. By using the appropriate receiver grouping, the grouping crosscorrelation imaging can image the source with high spatial resolution and appropriate computational time. It has a strong adaptability to low SNR data, and is a promising method for surface microseismic location.

Key words: Microseismic locating, Low SNR data, Reverse-time imaging, Imaging condition, Grouping crosscorrelation

中图分类号:

P631

李青峰, 张建中. 2019. 基于分组互相关成像条件的微震逆时成像定位方法. 地球物理学进展, 34(1): 125-135. doi: 10.6038/pg2019BB0420.

LI Qing-feng, ZHANG Jian-zhong. 2019. Reverse-time image for microseismic localization using grouping crosscorrelation imaging condition. Progress in Geophysics. 34(1): 125-135. doi: 10.6038/pg2019BB0420.

图/表 14

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

表2

参考文献 33

[1]	Artman B, Podladtchikov I, Witten B . 2010. Source location using time-reverse imaging[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 58(5):861-873. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00911.x
[2]	Claerbout J F . 1971. Toward a unified theory of reflector mapping[J]. Geophysics, 36(3):467-481. doi: 10.1190/1.1440185
[3]	Dong S T, Gao H X . 2004. Microseismic monitering technology and its application to oilfield development[J]. P.I. (in Chinese), 18(5):5-8.
[4]	Douma J, Snieder R . 2015. Focusing of elastic waves for microseismic imaging[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 200(1):390-401. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggu398
[5]	Gajewski D, Tessmer E . 2005. Reverse modelling for seismic event characterization[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 163(1):276-284. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02732.x
[6]	He Y, Zhang J Z, Li T Y . 2016. Improved source-scanning algorithm for microseismic location[J]. China Sciencepaper (in Chinese), 11(21):2450-2455.
[7]	Kao H, Shan S J . 2004. The Source-Scanning Algorithm: mapping the distribution of seismic sources in time and space[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 157(2):589-594. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02276.x
[8]	Larmat C S, Guyer R A, Johnson P A . 2009. Tremor source location using time reversal: Selecting the appropriate imaging field[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 36(22):355-355. doi: 10.1029/2009GL040099
[9]	Larmat C S, Guyer R A, Johnson P A . 2010. Time-reversal methods in geophysics[J]. Physics Today, 63(8):31-35. doi: 10.1063/1.3480073
[10]	Li L, Chen H, Wang X M . 2015. Weighted-elastic-wave interferometric imaging of microseismic source location[J]. Applied Geophysics, 12(2):221-234. doi: 10.1007/s11770-015-0479-z
[11]	Li Z C, Sheng G Q, Wang W B , et al. 2014. Time-reverse microseismic hypocenter location with interferometric imaging condition based on surface and downhole multi-components[J]. OGP (in Chinese), 49(4):661-666, 671.
[12]	Liu H, Zhang J Z . 2014. STA/LTA algorithm analysis and improvement of Microseismic signal automatic detection[J]. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 29(4):1708-1714, doi: 10.6038/pg20140429. doi: 10.6038/pg20140429
[13]	Liu H, Zhang J Z, Huang Z L . 2015. Microseismic event detection based on synchrosqueezing wavelet transform[J]. China Sciencepaper (in Chinese), 10(21):2472-2476.
[14]	Liu Z W, Sa L M, Wu F R , et al. 2013. Microseismic monitor technology status for unconventional resource E&P and its future development in CNPC[J]. OGP (in Chinese), 48(5):843-853.
[15]	Lü H . 2012. Research on the seismic phase identification and the source location based on oilfield fracture microseismic monitoring [Ph.D. thesis]. Changchun: Jilin University.
[16]	Nakata N, Beroza G C . 2016. Reverse time migration for microseismic sources using the geometric mean as an imaging condition[J]. Geophysics, 81(2): KS51-KS60. doi: 10.1190/geo2015-0278.1
[17]	Sava P . 2011. Micro-earthquake monitoring with sparsely sampled data[J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration & Production Technology, 1(1):43-49. doi: 10.1007/s13202-011-0005-7
[18]	Wang C L, Cheng J B, Yin C , et al. 2013. Microseismic events location of surface and borehole observation with reverse-time focusing using interferometry technique[J]. Chinese J. Geophys (in Chinese), 56(9):3184-3196, doi: 10.6038/cjg20130931. doi: 10.6038/cjg20130931
[19]	Xu J P . 2011. Research of crack monitoring and its application[J]. Science Technology and Engineering (in Chinese), 11(11):2575-2577.
[20]	Zhang J Z, Liu H, Zou ZH , et al. 2015. Velocity modeling and inversion techniques for locating microseismic events in unconventional reservoirs[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 26(4):495-501. doi: 10.1007/s12583-015-0565-4
[21]	Zhang S, Liu Q L, Zhao Q , et al. 2002. Application of microseismic monitoring technology in development of oil field[J]. GPP (in Chinese), 41(2):226-231. doi: 10.1007/s11769-002-0037-5
[22]	Zou Z H, Zhou H W, Bian A , et al. 2015. An Evaluation of Reverse-Time Imaging of Clustering Earthquakes[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 26(4):548-555. doi: 10.1007/s12583-015-0563-6
[23]	Zou Z H, Zhou H W, Gurrola H . 2014. Reverse-time imaging of a doublet of microearthquakes in the Three Gorges Reservoir region[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 196(3):1858-1868. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt499
[24]	董世泰, 高红霞 . 2004. 微地震监测技术及其在油田开发中的应用[J]. 石油仪器, 18(5):5-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9134.2004.05.002
[25]	何勇, 张建中, 李同宇 . 2016. 改进的震源扫描定位方法[J]. 中国科技论文, 11(21):2450-2455. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2783.2016.21.010
[26]	李振春, 盛冠群, 王维波 , 等. 2014. 井地联合观测多分量微地震逆时干涉定位[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 49(4):661-666, 671.
[27]	刘晗, 张建中 . 2014. 微震信号自动检测的STA/LTA算法及其改进分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 29(4):1708-1714, doi: 10.6038/pg20140429. doi: 10.6038/pg20140429
[28]	刘晗, 张建中, 黄忠来 . 2015. 利用同步挤压变换检测微地震信号[J]. 中国科技论文, 10(21):2472-2476. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2783.2015.21.002
[29]	刘振武, 撒利明, 巫芙蓉 , 等. 2013. 中国石油集团非常规油气微地震监测技术现状及发展方向[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 48(5):843-853.
[30]	吕昊 . 2012. 基于油田压裂微地震监测的震相识别与震源定位方法研究[博士论文]. 长春: 吉林大学.
[31]	王晨龙, 程玖兵, 尹陈 , 等. 2013. 地面与井中观测条件下的微地震干涉逆时定位算法[J]. 地球物理学报, 56(9):3184-3196, doi: 10.6038/cjg20130931. doi: 10.6038/cjg20130931
[32]	徐剑平 . 2011. 裂缝监测方法研究及应用实例[J]. 科学技术与工程, 11(11):2575-2577. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2011.11.040
[33]	张山, 刘清林, 赵群 , 等. 2002. 微地震监测技术在油田开发中的应用[J]. 石油物探, 41(2):226-231. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2002.02.021

信噪比/dB	自相关成像	互相关成像	分组互相关成像
0	48	7694	262
-13	49	7736	264
-14	48	7623	263
-16	52	7705	266

基于分组互相关成像条件的微震逆时成像定位方法

Reverse-time image for microseismic localization using grouping crosscorrelation imaging condition

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 14

参考文献 33

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

多维度评价

本文评价

[1]	王敏玲,梁值欢,王洪华,龚俊波,张智,熊彬. 探地雷达逆时偏移成像方法研究现状及进展[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 2087-2096.
[2]	王敏玲,廖天元,王洪华,张智,熊彬. 基于FDTD的探地雷达三维逆时偏移成像[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(4): 1671-1678.
[3]	鲁雁翔,白超英. 起伏层状介质中曲线交错网格有限差分弹性波逆时偏移成像[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(2): 605-614.
[4]	张茗,刘怀山. 基于干涉成像条件的弹性波震源逆时定位研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(5): 2070-2075.
[5]	于富文,刘斌,范景文,李振春. 逆时偏移中几种角度域成像条件噪声压制效果分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(1): 297-303.
[6]	张伟,石颖. 矢量分离纵横波场的弹性波逆时偏移[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(4): 1728-1734.
[7]	韩文功,王江川,李振春,孙小东,陈静. 基于Poynting矢量和方向行波波场分离的逆时偏移成像条件[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2015, 30(6): 2660-2665.
[8]	王娟,李振春. TTI介质矢量波成像及波型分解[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2014, 29(6): 2754-2760.
[9]	徐兴荣,王西文,王宇超,胡自多,刘文卿,高厚强. 基于波场分离理论的逆时偏移成像条件研究及应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2012, (5): 2084-2090.
[10]	王娟,李振春,陶丽. 逆时偏移成像条件研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2012, 27(3): 1173-1182.
[11]	丁仁伟,李振春,孙小东,仝兆岐. 叠前逆时深度偏移中的激发时间成像条件[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2008, 23(6): 1859-1865.