基于零偏VSP三种Q值反演方法对比分析及应用

doi:10.6038/pg20170534

地球物理学进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 2107-2114.doi: 10.6038/pg20170534

基于零偏VSP三种Q值反演方法对比分析及应用

武银婷^1,2, 朱光明¹

1. 长安大学地质工程与测绘学院, 西安 710054;
2. 西安交通大学电子工程与信息学院, 西安 710049

收稿日期:2017-02-16 修回日期:2017-08-14 出版日期:2017-10-20 发布日期:2017-10-20
作者简介:武银婷,女,1982年生,博士,主要研究方向为地震衰减和多次波压制等方法研究.(E-mail:wuyinting0215@163.com)
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（41204076）、中国博士后基金（2013M540756，2014T70925）和陕西省自然科学基金（2014JQ2-4019）联合资助.

Comparison and application of three different methods for inversing Q value with zero-offset VSP data

WU Yin-ting^1,2, ZHU Guang-ming¹

1. Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, China;
2. Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China

Received:2017-02-16 Revised:2017-08-14 Online:2017-10-20 Published:2017-10-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

准确提取Q值是研究地层吸收衰减特性的关键.对三种Q值反演方法（质心频率法、振幅衰减法、频谱比法）进行对比分析，旨在为衰减特性的求取提供参考.针对零偏VSP数据进行计算，对比总结薄层、频带宽度及低衰减层、波场成分、界面干扰等条件下Q值反演与层位揭示的准确性及差异性：对于相对较薄的层位，质心频率法几乎能准确揭示所有地层，而其他两种方法在薄层分界面处出现异常，误差超过200%；高频成分对频率域方法影响较大，尤其是对于低衰减层的反演；只有下/上行波场时三种方法计算结果相似，全波场时质心频率法效果较好；反射界面的存在会对三种方法造成干扰，反演值在界面处出现跳跃.对比分析三种方法在实际VSP数据应用可知：Q值分层比速度曲线更为敏感，质心频率法Q值反演曲线与地质分层吻合程度最好.

Abstract:

This paper elaborates three different methods, including centroid frequency shift (CFS) method, amplitude attenuation method and spectral ratios method to inverse quality factor value (Q), which is the attenuation characterization. Contrasting on the results from series of zero-offset VSP model data, we discuss several factors to influence the inversion, including thin layers, frequency ranges, low-attenuation layers, different waveform components, and the interface interferences. We find that CFS method is more stable and accurate to layers with high Q value, interface interference, different waveforms, while, other two methods get deviation. Specifically, amplitude attenuation method has the least stability, while, compared with other two methods, CFS is the most powerful to anti interface interferences with the minimum fluctuates; Furthermore, from the application of three methods to field VSP data we can see that, the curve from CFS is consistent with lithologic core best and can reveal depths of each layers better than corresponding velocity curve, however, the other two methods just can show the main trend of Q values with poorly accuracy.

中图分类号:

P631

武银婷, 朱光明. 2017. 基于零偏VSP三种Q值反演方法对比分析及应用. 地球物理学进展, 32(5): 2107-2114. doi: 10.6038/pg20170534.

WU Yin-ting, ZHU Guang-ming. 2017. Comparison and application of three different methods for inversing Q value with zero-offset VSP data. Progress in Geophysics. 32(5): 2107-2114. doi: 10.6038/pg20170534.

参考文献

Brzostowski M A, McMechan G A. 1992. 3-D tomographic imaging of near-surface seismic velocity and attenuation[J]. Geophysics, 57(3):396-403.
Chen W S, Guan L P, Li Z C, et al. 2014. Prestack Q-inversion based on generalized S transform[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum (in Chinese), 53(6):706-712, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2014.06.011.
Chen Y M. 2016. Full combinatorial optimization Q value calculation method[J]. Process in Geophysics (in Chinese), 31(4):1557-1561, doi:10.6038/pg20160419.
Dasgupta R, Clark R A. 1998. Estimation of Q from surface seismic reflection data[J]. Geophysics, 63(6):2120-2128.
Gao J H, Yang S L. 2007. On the method of quality factors estimation from zero-offset VSP data[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 50(4):1198-1209, doi:10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2007.04.029.
Jacobson R S, Shor Jr G G, Dorman L M, et al. 1981. Linear inversion of body wave data-Part Ⅱ:Attenuation versus depth using spectral ratios[J]. Geophysics, 46(2):152-162.
Jeng Y, Tsai J Y, Chen S H. 1999. An improved method of determining near-surface Q[J]. Geophysics, 64(5):1608-1617, doi:10.1190/1.1444665.
Quan Y L, Harris J M. 1997. Seismic attenuation tomography using the frequency shift method[J]. Geophysics, 62(3):895-905.
Sams M, Goldberg D. 1990. The validity of Q estimates from borehole data using spectral ratios[J]. Geophysics, 55(1):97-101.
Spencer T W, Edwards C M, Sonnad J R. 1977. Seismic wave attenuation in nonresolvable cyclic stratification[J]. Geophysics, 42(5):939-949.
Tonn R. 1991. The determination of the seismic quality factor Q from VSP data:A comparison of different computational methods[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 39(1):1-27.
Toverud T, Ursin B. 2005. Comparison of seismic attenuation models using zero-offset vertical seismic profiling (VSP) data[J]. Geophysics, 70(2):F17-F25, doi:10.1190/1.1884827.
Wang H, Chang X, Gao F. 2001. Several methods of crosswell seismic attenuation tomography[J]. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 16(1):104-109, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2001.01.014.
Wang Z J. 2015. Quality factor estimation by centroid frequency shift of spectrum fitting[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum (in Chinese), 54(3):267-273, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2015.03.004.
Ward R W, Young C Y. 1980. Mapping seismic attenuation within geothermal systems using teleseisms with application to the Geysers Clear Lake region[J]. J. Geophys. Res., 85(B10):5227-5236, doi:10.1029/JB085iB10p05227.
Watanabe T, Sassa K. 1996. Seismic attenuation tomography and its application to rock mass evaluation[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 33(5):467-477.
Wu Y T, Zhu G M, Liu Y K, et al. 2010. Study on CFS method in Q inversion using zero-offset VSP data[J]. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 25(6):1897-1904, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2010.06.003.
Xin K F, Li Z C, Wang Y G, et al. 2001. Formation equivalent absorption coefficient inversion[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum (in Chinese), 40(4):14-20.
Yan Y S, Yi M L, Wei X, et al. 2001. Joint tomographic imaging for cross-hole seismic velocity and Q value[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting (in Chinese), 36(1):9-17.
Zhang F C, Zhang X X, Zhang L Q, et al. 2016. Extraction method for quality factor Q based on adaptive wavelet decomposition[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum (in Chinese), 55(1):41-48, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2016.01.006.
Zhu D, Min X G, Gu H M. 2006. Inversion of attention coefficient based on frequency shift[J]. Process in Exploration Geophysics (in Chinese), 29(1):30-33.
陈文爽, 管路平, 李振春,等. 2014. 基于广义S变换的叠前Q值反演方法研究[J]. 石油物探, 53(6):706-712, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2014.06.011.
陈雨茂. 2016. 全组合最优化Q值计算方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 31(4):1557-1561, doi:10.6038/pg20160419.
高静怀, 杨森林. 2007. 利用零偏移VSP资料估计介质品质因子方法研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 50(4):1198-1209, doi:10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2007.04.029.
王辉, 常旭, 高峰. 2001. 井间地震波衰减成像的几种方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 16(1):104-109, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2001.01.014.
王宗俊. 2015. 基于谱模拟的质心法品质因子估算[J]. 石油物探, 54(3):267-273, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2015.03.004.
武银婷, 朱光明, 刘伊克,等. 2010. 零偏VSP反演Q值CFS方法及影响因素研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 25(6):1897-1904, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2010.06.003.
辛可锋, 李振春, 王永刚,等. 2001. 地层等效吸收系数反演[J]. 石油物探, 40(4):14-20.
严又生, 宜明理, 魏新,等. 2001. 井间地震速度和Q值联合层析成像及应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 36(1):9-17.
张繁昌, 张汛汛, 张立强,等. 2016. 基于自适应子波分解的品质因子Q提取方法[J]. 石油物探, 55(1):41-48, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2016.01.006.
朱定, 闵小刚, 顾汉明. 2006. 基于主频偏移反演地层的吸收系数[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 29(1):30-33.

[1]	屈念念,李家斌,张西君,刘俊. 基于重磁资料研究贵州省深部构造特征[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1785-1793.
[2]	安鹏,曹丹平,赵宝银,杨晓利,张明. 基于LSTM循环神经网络的储层物性参数预测方法研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1849-1858.
[3]	陈稳,薛国强,陈卫营,周楠楠,卢云飞. SOTEM多分量激电响应特性分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1859-1865.
[4]	豆辉,徐逸鹤. 黏性逆时偏移成像研究进展[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1866-1877.
[5]	毛庆辉,王鹏,曾隽. 水力压裂微地震事件定位方法综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1878-1886.
[6]	尚新民,王延光,崔庆辉,金昌昆,赵翠霞,滕厚华,赵胜天. 准南缘山前带精细近地表建模技术研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1887-1892.
[7]	石战战,夏艳晴,王元君,周怀来,庞溯,池跃龙. 基于L₁-L₁范数稀疏表示的共偏移距道集地震数据重建方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1893-1899.
[8]	王迪,陈敏,王健伟,盛志超,严曙梅,马美媛,李东哲,郑欣. 基于T₂和毛管压力分类转换的渗透率计算新方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1900-1909.
[9]	王海波,张伟,张宏,肖虎,高云路,顾剑华,唐美斌,韩峰. 高精度可控震源在深反射地震采集中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1910-1916.
[10]	王静, 张军华, 王延光, 杨勇, 冯德永, 武刚, 黄德峰. 特征值相干理论诠释及效果比较[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1917-1923.
[11]	王维红,包培楠,陈国飞,林弘喆. 基于最小平方的横波速度拟合及应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1924-1929.
[12]	王亚,王孟华,田建章,王成泉,彭玲丽,冯小英,周兴海,张浩. 一种适用于深潜山及内幕的有效储层地震预测方法——以廊固凹陷杨税务潜山为例[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1930-1937.
[13]	吴曲波,潘自强,陈金勇,Mubarak,Hani. 利用瞬态瑞雷面波法探测浅层玄武岩三维分布——以沙特Sabkhah Ad Dumathah地区为例[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1938-1944.
[14]	严小丽,康慧敏,王光杰,何国丽,李红领. AMT方法在鳌山卫花岗岩地区深部地热构造勘探中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1945-1953.
[15]	尹奇峰,潘冬明,郭全仕,何情. 基于快速模拟退火算法的井中微地震事件定位反演[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1954-1961.

基于零偏VSP三种Q值反演方法对比分析及应用

Comparison and application of three different methods for inversing Q value with zero-offset VSP data

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

多维度评价

本文评价