部分共反射面元叠加技术在海上数据中的应用

doi:10.6038/pg2018AA0142

地球物理学进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 1721-1725.doi: 10.6038/pg2018AA0142

• 应用地球物理学Ⅱ（海洋、工程、环境、仪器等） • 上一篇下一篇

部分共反射面元叠加技术在海上数据中的应用

王志亮¹,孙小东^2,^*(),王旭谦³,李振春²,倪雪灿³,张敏²

^1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司,天津 300452
^2. 中国石油大学(华东),山东青岛 266580
^3. 中海油田服务股份有限公司物探事业部,天津 300459;;

收稿日期:2017-09-21 修回日期:2018-06-22 出版日期:2018-08-20 发布日期:2018-09-14
通讯作者: 孙小东 E-mail:wanliliuyun@163.com
作者简介:王志亮,1979年生,高级工程师,研究方向为地震资料采集处理.(E-mail: wangzhl5@cnooc.com.cn)
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项课题基金(2016ZX05024-003-011);国家自然科学基金(41574098,41504100);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(18CX02059A)

Pre-stack data enhancement by partial Common Reflection Surface (CRS) stack

WANG Zhi-liang¹,SUN Xiao-dong^2,^*(),WANG Xu-qian³,LI Zhen-chun²,NI Xue-can³,ZHANG Min²

^1. CNOOC (Chinese) Company Limited,Tianjin Branch,Tianjin 300452, China
^2. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum,Shandong Qingdao 266580, China
^3. Geophysical Division of China Oilfield Services Limited, Tianjin 300459, China

Received:2017-09-21 Revised:2018-06-22 Online:2018-08-20 Published:2018-09-14
Contact: Xiao-dong SUN E-mail:wanliliuyun@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文对共反射面元(CRS)叠加方法做改进,利用得到的波场参数来提高叠前地震资料的质量.利用CRS波场参数做部分CRS叠加,对菲涅尔带内的多个相邻CMP道集做倾角、曲率等校正后合并为一个道集即CRS超道集,可以补齐缺失地震道,实现叠前数据规则化,并提高信噪比.从而使得叠前道集中的同相轴尤其是来自深层的反射有更好的连续性,有利于识别和追踪.提高质量后的叠前道集可用于后续的速度分析、叠加、偏移等常规处理中,效果好于原始CMP道集.模型和实际数据的计算结果验证了该方法的正确性和有效性.该方法在低信噪比资料的处理中将会有广阔的应用前景.

关键词: 波场参数, CRS超道集, 数据规则化, 信噪比

Abstract:

In this paper, the technology of Common Reflection Surface (CRS) stack is modified so that a new pre-stack data enhancement method by kinematic wave-field parameters obtained from Common Reflection Surface (CRS) stack is introduced. Using CRS parameters from partial CRS stack (correct several CMP gathers in a CRS super-gather and output as one CMP gather) seismic trace supplement and pre-stack data regularization can be applied. Meanwhile, signal to noise ratio is also be improved. As a result reflection events especially from deep region in pre-stack gathers have better continuity and are more easier to be identified. Pre-stack gathers with improved quality can be applied in successive conventional processes such as velocity analysis, stack, migration and so on. Its result is much better than original CMP gather, which is verified by test on synthetic and real data. It is hopeful that this method has promising application in low S/N field data later on.

Key words: wave-field parameters, CRS super-gather, data regularization, signal to noise ratio

中图分类号:

P631
P738

王志亮, 孙小东, 王旭谦, 李振春, 倪雪灿, 张敏. 2018. 部分共反射面元叠加技术在海上数据中的应用. 地球物理学进展, 33(4): 1721-1725. doi: 10.6038/pg2018AA0142.

Zhi-liang WANG, Xiao-dong SUN, Xu-qian WANG, Zhen-chun LI, Xue-can NI, Min ZHANG. 2018. Pre-stack data enhancement by partial Common Reflection Surface (CRS) stack. Progress in Geophysics. 33(4): 1721-1725. doi: 10.6038/pg2018AA0142.

图/表 3

参考文献 37

[1]	Alpius D G, Djoko S, Awali P, et al. 2013. Offset aperture optimization of partial CRS stack based on AVO gradient for reservoir characterization [C]. Proceedings of the 11th SEGJ International Symposium: 194-197.
[2]	Anders U W, Hao Z, Jorge H F , et al. 2018. Fast and robust common-reflection-surface parameter estimation[J]. Geophysics, 83(1):1-13, doi. org/10.1190/geo2017-0113.1. doi: 10.1190/geo2018-0625-tiogeo.1
[3]	Benjamin S, Claudia V, Dirk G , et al. 2014. Curvatures and inhomogeneities: An improved common-reflection-surface approach[J]. Geophysics, 79(5):S231-S240. doi: 10.1190/geo2013-0196.1
[4]	Dmitry N, Reda B, Evgeny L . 2006. Residual stereotomographic inversion[J]. Geophysics, 71(4):E35-E39. doi: 10.1190/1.2216191
[5]	Ernesto B, Antonio M C, Daniela T, et al. 2009. 3D CRS analysis: a data-driven optimization for the simultaneous estimation of the eight parameters [C]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts: 3284-3291.
[6]	German G . 2018. A comparative study of common-reflection-surface prestack time migration and data regularization: Application in crooked-line data[J]. Geophysics, 83(4):355-364, doi. org/10.1190/geo2017-0691.1. doi: 10.1190/geo2017-0691.1
[7]	Gian P D, Enzo B, Zeno H . 2012. Common-reflection-surface imaging of shallow and ultrashallow reflectors[J]. Geophysics, 77(4):B177-B185. doi: 10.1190/geo2011-0401.1
[8]	Guido G, Henning T, Juergen P, et al. 2009. Enhanced velocity analysis, binning, gap infill and imaging of sparse 2D/3D seismic data by CRS techniques [C]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts: 3279-3283.
[9]	Guido G, Juergen P, Andrea L, et al. 2012. CRS based gas monitoring and reservoir characterization from 3D seismic data [C]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts: 493-497.
[10]	Juergen P, Sven F, Rodolfo B , et al. 2008. CRS-based depth model building and imaging of 3D seismic data from the Gulf of Mexico Coast[J]. Geophysics, 73(5): VE303-VE311. doi: 10.1190/1.2968691
[11]	Leonardo T D, Renato R L, Jorge H, et al. 2013. Separation of Reflection from Diffraction Events via the CRS Technique and a Blind Source Separation Method based on Sparsity Maximization [C]. 13th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society & EXPOGEF : 1439-1443.
[12]	Li Z C, Sun X D, Liu H . 2006. Common reflection surface stack for rugged surface topography[J]. Chinese J. Geophys (in Chinese), 49(6):1794-1801, doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2006.06.027. doi: 10.1002/cjg2.991
[13]	Li Z C, Yao Y X, Ma Z T , et al. 2003. Modeling of common reflection surface gather offset velocity[J]. Earthquake Science, 25(4):406-414, doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2003.04.008.
[14]	Maria T D, Ana M R, Germán Y O, et al. 2009. Comparative analysis between Common Reflection Surface (CRS) and NMO/DMO stack technique from the structural point of view [C]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts: 2960-2964.
[15]	Michael S Z, Vladimir B, Masashi E, et al. 2012. Laboratory-based GEMTIP analysis of spectral IP data for mineral discrimination [C]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts: 1-5.
[16]	Müller N A, Matthieu B, Francis C. 2013. 3D Common-Offset CRS stack: simplified formulation and application to foothills data [C]. SSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts: 4262-4266.
[17]	Parsa B R, Benjamin S, Claudia V, et al. 2014. Common reflection surface (CRS) based pre-stack diffraction separation [C]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts: 4208-4212.
[18]	Parsa B R, Benjamin S, Dirk G , et al. 2018. Common-reflection-surface-based prestack diffraction separation and imaging[J]. Geophysics, 83(1):S47-S55, doi. org/10.1190/geo2016-0445.1. doi: 10.1190/geo2016-0445.1
[19]	Rodrigo B, Tiago A C, Jorge H F , et al. 2018. Common-reflection-surface method in weakly anisotropic vertical transverse isotropic media[J]. Geophysics, 83(3):C99-C113, doi. org/10.1190/geo2017-0368.1. doi: 10.1190/geo2017-0368.1
[20]	Soleimani M, Mann J, Khalilzadeh H A, et al. 2012. Seismic imaging in complex region of Zagros thrust fault belt by CRS and CDS stack method [C]. International Geophysical Conference and Oil & Gas Exhibition: 1-4.
[21]	Sun X D, Li Z C, Teng H H . 2007. Common reflection surface stack using dip decomposition for rugged surface topography[J]. Applied Geophysics, 4(1):45-50. doi: 10.1007/s11770-007-0007-x
[22]	Tan W Y, Zhao B, Yang C C . 2007. Calculation of travel time curved face of Common Reflecfion surface[J]. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 22(3):843-849, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2007.03.028. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5791(07)60044-X
[23]	Tilman K. 2006. Uncertainty estimation for kinematic wavefield attributes [C]. SEG/New Orleans Annual Meeting: 3011-3015.
[24]	Wang H Z, Yang K, Ma Z T . 2004. An applied theory on common reflection surface stack-from co-mmom reflection point to common reflection surface[J]. Chinese J. of Geophys(in Chinese), 47(1):137-142, doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2008.06.032.
[25]	Wu X Y, Liu T Y, Wei W , et al. 2008. Two dimentional common reflection surface stack based on the Fresnel zone[J]. Chinese J. of Geophys.(in Chinese), 51(6):1892-1898, doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2008.06.032. doi: 10.1002/cjg2.1317
[26]	Yang K, Ma Z T, Luo W D . 2006. The common reflection surface element overlay method II ——practice[J]. Chinese J. of Geophys(in Chinese), 49(3):895-902, doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2006.03.035.
[27]	Yao N, Kai Y. 2012. A GPU Based 3D Common Reflection Surface Stack Algorithm with the Output Imaging Scheme (3D-CRS-OIS) [C]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts: 195-198.
[28]	Zhang J Y, Liu Y . 2011. A review of common reflection surface element superposition method[J]. Progress in Geophysics(in Chinese), 26(05):1717-1732,doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2011.05.026.
[29]	Zhang T Q, Wang Z H, Niu B H . 2008. Application and Development of CRS stack Technology in China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing(in Chinese), 27(2):128-131, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2008.02.034.
[30]	李振春, 孙小东, 刘洪 . 2006. 复杂地表条件下共反射面元(CRS)叠加方法研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 49(6):1794-1801, doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2006.06.027.
[31]	李振春, 姚云霞, 马在田 , 等. 2003. 共反射面道集偏移速度建模[J]. 地震学报, 25(4):406-414, doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2003.04.008. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-3782.2003.04.008
[32]	谭未一, 赵兵, 杨长春 . 2007. 共反射面元走时曲面计算方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 22(3):843-849, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2007.03.028. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2007.03.028
[33]	王华忠, 杨锴, 马在田 . 2004. 共反射面元叠加的应用理论——从共反射点到共反射面元[J]. 地球物理学报, 47(1):137-142, doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2008.06.032.
[34]	吴小羊, 刘天佑, 魏伟 , 等. 2008. 二维菲涅耳带共反射面元叠加方法研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 51(6):1892-1898, doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2008.06.032. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2008.06.032
[35]	杨锴, 马在田, 罗卫东 . 2006. 输出道成像方式的共反射面元叠加方法II——实践[J]. 地球物理学报, 49(3):895-902, doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2006.03.035.
[36]	张晶玉, 刘洋 . 2011. 共反射面元叠加方法综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 26(5):1717-1732, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2011.05.026. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2011.05.026
[37]	张铁强, 王兆湖, 牛滨华 . 2008. CRS叠加技术在国内的应用和发展[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 27(2):128-131, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2008.02.034.

部分共反射面元叠加技术在海上数据中的应用

Pre-stack data enhancement by partial Common Reflection Surface (CRS) stack

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

多维度评价

本文评价

[1]	周威,黄良珂,刘立龙,陈军,李松青. 基于GLONASS-MR技术的雪深探测研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(5): 1842-1848.
[2]	梁北援,王会卿. 微破裂向量扫描在微震监测中的解释原则[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(4): 1314-1322.
[3]	裴易峰,荣亮亮,张懿,殷长春,伍俊,王远,谢晓明. 低温SQUID瞬变电磁法中去除地磁场影响的方法研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(2): 622-627.
[4]	李青峰,张建中. 基于分组互相关成像条件的微震逆时成像定位方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(1): 125-135.
[5]	张晟瑞,任朝发,李星缘,王维红,王贵友. 地面微地震资料噪声压制方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(6): 2522-2527.
[6]	许连明. 全频率小波去噪方法在随钻四极横波测井中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(5): 2034-2040.
[7]	国胧予,刘财,刘洋. 滤波类方法衰减地震数据噪声[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(5): 1890-1896.
[8]	金震,李山有,蔡辉腾,李培,李海艳,徐嘉隽. 谱白化叠加方法在气枪信号检测中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(4): 1358-1365.
[9]	吴海波,张平松,董守华. 分叉煤层时间域分辨率的探讨[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(4): 1603-1608.
[10]	魏继东. 模拟与数字检波器记录精度对比及其对信噪比的影响[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(4): 1726-1733.
[11]	郭爱华,叶月明,臧梅,李立胜,李玉存,吴吉忠. 老爷庙火成岩发育区低信噪比资料处理关键技术探讨[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(3): 1043-1050.
[12]	杨晶,黄建平. 基于汉宁窗函数滤波时间域高斯束成像方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(3): 1161-1166.
[13]	周文强,周鹏,金少华,戴永寿. 海洋可控源电磁勘探中双对称发射波形的优化[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(6): 2717-2722.
[14]	林彬华,李军,金星,黄玲珠,韦永祥,陈惠芳,陈智勇. 气枪信号实时处理系统研发及应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(4): 1808-1816.
[15]	汪佳. 共反射面元方法及在大庆油田深层目标勘探的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(1): 287-291.